ScamVictimsUnited.com

There is strength in numbers.

Scams in Today's News:


Bookmark and Share
It is currently Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:51 am



All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:22 pm
Posts: 13
Last week I received a check in the mail likewise, with likewise paperwork seeming to indicate that there will be future checks. The check I received is approximately 39% of what I had hitherto lost. It is now deposited and locked in my savings account.

God willing, I and everyone else will receive the balance of the money we had hitherto lost. In the impact statement letter I wrote to the judge, "I want my $_____ back with interest. I have a future to build with it."

I know I've learned an important lesson from this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: To Gemster
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:04 pm
Posts: 56
Gemster, I'm so proud that we all have received what we have so far. I wonder why everyone else is reporting a 60-something-percent check and yours is 39%? I certainly hope you receive more since you got back a lower percentage. But, of course, I hope we all receive more! What we've gotten so far, though, is more than I ever thought. I expected to receive nothing back, actually. I credit Mr. Cinnamo with that. Out of everyone we contacted, HE took the ball and ran with it while the others just filed us away (it seems).

Like you - I think I've learned a valuable lesson as well.

My only regret is that "Linda Stocker" and "Cecil Starkman" and the "names" rest of you dealt with are still running loose. But, I'll take my learned lesson and move on.

I'm proud of all of us, actually. We contacted everyone we knew about these thieves and did what we could to protect others. The agency I'm most disappointed in is the BBB. I will never use their endorsement as a positive incentive ever again.

emdee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: To Gemster
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:22 pm
Posts: 13
emdee wrote:
I will never use their endorsement as a positive incentive ever again.


In fairness, the BBB does ot endorse any particular business, if you read their site, and they also acknowledge that a BBB seal of approval does not indicate a sure-fire good entity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Updates?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:32 am
Posts: 6
Wondering if anyone has received further compensation?

Also still curious about tax liabilities as pertains to this kind of restitution? The laws are grey and seem to lean favorably to only certain cases. Any good CPA out there that can shed some light?

_________________
Lessons learned the hard way!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: To Gemster
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 1:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:22 pm
Posts: 13
Gemster wrote:
In fairness, the BBB does ot endorse any particular business, if you read their site, and they also acknowledge that a BBB seal of approval does not indicate a sure-fire good entity.


Typographical error. The "ot" above should be "not".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Another check arrived!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:00 pm
Posts: 10
Location: New Jersey
My relative received a second reimbursement check today! It was for several hundred dollars, or roughly 10 percent of the unreimbursed remainder. Very pleased and hope others have similar news in the days to come.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:24 am
Posts: 8
To my great surprise I received a second reinbursement check yesterday. Thanks again to Mr. Cinnamo and all involved. :o :shock: :D :!: :!: :!:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Another Check!
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:32 am
Posts: 6
Just received another check today! Looks to be 10.4% of the remaining loss. Thank you again! :)

_________________
Lessons learned the hard way!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 12:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:22 pm
Posts: 13
Received a check today for 2.4% of the total amount lost. It's money, but I feel that I should call or write them to verify that they have my accurate total loss on file. Not that that would guarantee anything, but I'd feel better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 9:20 pm
Posts: 15
Got a check for approx 4% of my losses this weekend. Gemster, I think the amounts from now on may not be apples to apples.

Thanks again to everyone here. Maybe someday we'll get it all back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 6
Location: Northern California
I too have received a second check as of today. This is great news. This second check covers about 6% of my total loss so perhaps we will get all of our lost monies back. I hope so but to be honest, I was ecstatic to receive the first check.

_________________
In my Jeep or on my feet,
nothing like the mountains!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 1:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 9:20 pm
Posts: 15
Not to be a bummer, but I doubt we'll see many more checks if any at all. The first wave of checks was probably funded by Mr. Eisenberg's bank accounts, the second by the liquidation of his assets. I would guess that he is now for all purposes flat broke and has no more money to offer restitution-wise. But we can always hope otherwise.

On another note, has anyone tried to sell any of these stones? Are we legally allowed to now? (They're not considered evidence are they?) Obviously we'd only be talking tens of dollars instead of the tens of thousands we were promised but I'd still rather have $25 in cash than three random green stones sitting in my desk drawer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 6
Location: Northern California
Hi Scottiegee, I asked Mr. Cinnamo the same question about whether we could sell the stones and he didn't have a definitive answer. One thing he did mention is that if we don't hear otherwise, we should be able to sell them. However, we need to get them reappraised and NOT use the original certification that came with them when we originally purchased them. He also told me to document the sale and keep a copy of this documentation just in case. Hope this helps

_________________
In my Jeep or on my feet,
nothing like the mountains!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: I got a 2nd one too
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:04 pm
Posts: 56
I received a 2nd check too. Thanks to Mr. Cinnamo again!!

As far as selling the piece, I won't try to. Personally, I don't want to pass it off to someone else if it is worthless. Maybe it will make a pretty necklace! LOL

I feel so much better having received some compensation but I still wish that "Linda Stocker" and "Cecil Starkman" could be found and charged.

Thanks to all of you who contributed with information and status reports!! Maybe we won't need this site again but I sure am glad it's here!! Thanks to those who run this site for allowing our scam to be made public.

edited to add: It looks like the LVZ website has been taken down.

emdee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Tax liability & lawsuit
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:55 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Mississippi
I'm new to this forum, but I also got swindled by Lucas Van Zenten. I have also received a couple of restitution checks. I was too embarassed to look for other people taken in by this scam, until a google search found this forum.

User sizzle5u asked about tax liability. I'm no expert, but the bottom line is, court-ordered restitution is NOT income. It's exactly what it says: Someone is paying you back for a loss. In lawsuits, when someone is found liable for damages, and ordered to pay the plaintiff, the judgement is not subject to income tax. I don't think it would be any different in a criminal case. Of course, when you deposit the restitution checks, the bank is going to report this to the IRS (if like me, they are several thousand dollars). The IRS may want to know where this money came from, so you need to keep your documents related to this case, like the letter attached to the 1st check. But they can't call it income. Also, you didn't make any profit from this, you are only recovering what you spent for the emeralds in the first place. And I don't think anyone on this forum has said they have recovered all their money yet, so you are still in the loss column.

If you are going to try to declare a loss on your income tax form due to theft, then I'm not sure how it impacts what I just said. And if you are in Canada, the laws are probably different there.

I haven't read all the posts here, but I was wondering if anyone knew the status of Lucas Van Zenten as a company, and if there is a lawsuit (especially a class-action) that has been filed against them.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next



All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Untitled document



Disclaimers, Message Board Guidelines and Privacy Policy   

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group